Commercialization of Interstate Rest Areas

PMAA’s Objectives

  • Preserve the federal ban on rest area commercialization of the Interstate Highway System.

  • Expand the federal commercialization ban to the entire National Highway System.

The Issue

Some state transportation departments are calling on Congress to commercialize interstate rest areas, and President Bush’s draft highway reauthorization plan would overturn the commercialization ban, changing longstanding federal law. Rest area commercialization would devastate communities across the nation by threatening interchange businesses that serve the needs of the highway traveler. Since Congress banned Interstate right-of-way development 47 years ago, we can see the wisdom of that decision to protect communities. Over 60,000 businesses have sprung up at interchanges across America, serving the needs of highway users and providing jobs and taxes for counties, cities and towns.

A commercialized rest area will sell fuel, food and other snack items to highway users from the convenience of the Interstate right-of-way. An interchange business, offering the highway traveler the same goods and services, cannot compete with the state-controlled business that is so conveniently located on the shoulder of the road.

Rest area commercialization would close as many as half of nearby interstate interchange businesses, such as travel plazas and truckstops, restaurants, gas stations and motels, according to a study just released by the University of Maryland. In addition, all future private sector development at the interchanges would come to a screeching halt. Businesses at the interchanges simply could not compete with a state-sanctioned monopoly operating on the highway shoulder.

Although some have suggested that nearby interchange businesses would have the first option to operate the commercialized facility, this offer ignores the investment the business owner has already made. There is simply no way a PMAA member could afford to walk away from their $8-12 million interchange investment to become a tenant of the state for a fixed number of years.

Commercialization of Interstate rest areas would destroy the property tax base of local governments. Quite simply, rest area commercialization replaces a property taxpayer supporting local government with a lessee who only supports the state transportation department. It is estimated that in 2002, interchange businesses contributed over $1.5 billion in property taxes to local governments, funds that are used for education, police and fire protection.

Previous efforts to commercialize Interstate rest areas have been strongly opposed by a wide coalition of groups, representing major chain restaurants, every facet of the oil industry from retailer to refiner, and even the National Federation of the Blind.

PMAA members, like other owners of highway service establishments, are entrepreneurs. In the American tradition, they have invested capital and created businesses in communities across the nation to serve the needs of highway travelers. They compete each day with other businesses on a level playing field. A commercialized rest area would quickly destroy that balance.

 

PMAA Staff Contact:

Sarah Dodge, Director of Legislative Affairs, (703) 351-8000 ext. 25

Return to:

Issue Papers Index | Government Affairs | PMAA Home Page